korea herald 사설읽기

South and North Korea are meeting today on the future of the Gaeseong Industrial Complex - a North Korean industrial park for South Korean corporations. It will be the second meeting since the North declared on May 15 that all inter-Korean accords on Gaeseong with regard to pay, rent and tax were null and void. Today's meeting is crucial. Depending on its outcome, South Korea may have to determine whether it will write the industrial complex off as a failed venture or continue to keep it as a mutually beneficial project combining capital from the South and labor from the North. But the prospects for a compromise will be dim if the North insists on its ill-advised demands - a four-fold increase in pay for North Korean workers, to $300 a month, and $500 million on top of the $16 million that was already paid in rent for the industrial complex site in 2004. South Korea has made clear in unmistakable terms that those demands are unacceptable. It is practically impossible for the South to back down even if it wishes to do so. The reason is that probably all companies operating in the complex will choose to pack up and leave. Why should they stay there when they can employ a worker for $100 in China and much less in Vietnam and Cambodia? The North would be grossly misguided if it entertained the illusion that the South Korean government could subsidize the chronic losses of companies manufacturing products in the complex. That is not the way capitalism works. No government could afford to pour huge amounts of money into a bottomless pit. Nor could the South Korean government under President Lee Myung-bak agree to $500 million in additional rent, which would be seen as nothing but a cash grant in disguise. That would be inconceivable to the conservative Lee administration, which accused its progressive predecessors of having lavished cash gifts on the North Korean communists. Neither the North nor the South would gain from the closure of the industrial complex, a likely eventuality for which they will do well to prepare. Its impact no doubt would be greater on the North, one of the poorest countries in the world, than on the South. For the North, the closure would mean a loss of $40 million a year - no small amount for the communist state, which has few other steady sources of hard currency. Even more painful should be the loss of 40,000 jobs in Gaeseong, a town with a population of 150,000. Abandoning the industrial complex would be costly to the South as well. The cost of building the industrial complex and much of the facility investments made by South Korean companies, both of which one estimate puts at 1 trillion won, would be irrecoverable. But that would not be the only loss. Among the conceivable but not-so-easily-quantifiable losses are a greater security risk for the nation, a fall in its creditworthiness and the potential flight of some foreign capital invested here. The fate of the industrial complex cannot be considered in the context of rent, pay and tax alone. It is a matter of not just cost and benefit but security. Public pressure is mounting against the idea of helping North Korea, which launched a long-range missile on April 5 and conducted its second nuclear test on May 25. Against this backdrop, the North will have to make a decision. It may choose to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs by pressing ahead with its absurd demands for a pay raise and additional rent. Or it may decide to keep the goose alive by accepting an alternative South Korean offer to build dormitories and nurseries for North Korean workers and a new road for commuters.

식물 (공개)
카페지기 세연
회원수20,585
방문수5
카페앱수1 프로필

▼ 내 정보

카페 전체 메뉴

▲

카페 초대

카페게임

이전 다음

게임하러 가기

친구 카페

이전 다음

글쓰기 답글 최신목록 | 목록 | ▲윗글 | ▼아랫글

[EDITORIAL] Failed venture? 2009.06.19| ★━━━━━━ [영자신문] ┣ 사설 원문 ┫

my 꿈 | 조회 37 |추천 0 | 2009.06.21. 03:36

스크랩 ▼ 0

인쇄 | 신고

첨부 이미지 삭제	등록 등록 취소
사진 올리기 비밀 설정 \| SNS 내보내기란?▶ 0 / 300자

링크 추가하기

줄이기

확인 취소

내 이미지 등록

블로그 프로필 직접 올리기

150x150/500KB
텍스티콘 사용 내용보기

확인 취소

글쓰기 답글 최신목록 | 목록 | ▲윗글 | ▼아랫글

★━━━━━━ [영자신문] ┣ 사설 원문 ┫ 게시판의 다른 글 더보기▶

제목	닉네임	날짜
[EDITORIAL] MBC controversy 2009.06.20	my 꿈	09.06.21
[EDITORIAL] Bottled water 2009.06.20	my 꿈	09.06.21
[EDITORIAL] Failed venture? 2009.06.19	my 꿈	09.06.21
[EDITORIAL] A 'way forward' 2009.06.19	my 꿈	09.06.21
[EDITORIAL] New level of alliance 2009.06.18	my 꿈	09.06.21

카페에서 공개한 게시글 입니다

incredibly 키워드로 검색한 게시글 더보기 ▶

▲top

http://cafe.daum.net/heraldedito

카페 전체 메뉴

카페게임

친구 카페